Trade fair: our group is exhibiting — Adhesives & Bonding Expo Europe, 10–12 November 2026, Messe Stuttgart, Hall 1, Booth 1001. Details and appointments →
The need: Your specification names a flame requirement and purchasing has to produce evidence, not a reassurance. Here is exactly what to ask for.
UL 510, UL 94 V-0, zero-halogen and “self-extinguishing” are four different requirements. Quote the clause from your drawing verbatim instead of paraphrasing it — a supplier answering a different clause in good faith is the most common reason a release stalls.
Then ask for the record at model level. A file number covers the types listed in it, not a product range. Our record under ANSI/CAN/UL 510A — file E544340, certificate UL-US-2552528-0, category OARC2 — covers tape type Z1V020. It is not evidence for other models, and it is not a UL 94 V-0 classification.
Send the clause and the application and EJOY says which document covers the proposed grade and which gap remains. Where no record exists for a model we say so rather than pointing at the file number.

Compliance is king — UL 510A Recognized Component, UL 94 V-0 grades, zero-halogen options.
Explore
The standard electronic-insulation cloth — heat-resistant, paint-absorbing, easy-tear.
Explore
The core wrap for OEM & Tier-1 automotive wiring harnesses — bundling, protection, noise damping.
ExploreStandard, edition, class and any halogen requirement, exactly as the drawing writes it.
File number, certificate number, category, standard and edition, and the tape type named in the record.
It is not covered by a flame classification. If the drawing carries both, ask for both declarations and their test basis.
File the document against the model you released, not against the supplier — that is what an audit asks for.
Model, standard and edition, the class, the file and certificate number, the category, and the tape type the record actually lists. Anything less cannot go into a compliance file.
No. It covers the types listed in it. Ours covers tape type Z1V020 under ANSI/CAN/UL 510A (file E544340, certificate UL-US-2552528-0, category OARC2) — and that record is not a UL 94 V-0 classification.
No. They are separate requirements with separate test bases. Ask for the halogen declaration explicitly if your drawing calls for it.
We say so, and the qualification has to establish it. That is a better starting position than a supplier who points at a file number covering a different model.
You have to re-source or dual-source a harness tape and the quotes you get back differ by 40% with no obvious reason. Here is the information that makes them comparable.
See recommended tapeA rattle complaint has come back from the field and you need a damping tape sourced, validated and released before the next build. Here is what the supplier needs from you.
See recommended tapeThe drawing calls for an under-hood abrasion class and you need a tape quoted against it, with evidence an auditor will accept. Here is what to specify.
See recommended tapeSend your material, temperature and environment — we'll confirm the grade and ship samples.
Request a Quote